Skip to content
Agent OS
AOS-LEGAL-011 Counsel-review engineering framework

Certification, Carrier, Security, and Compliance Contact Plan

Certification, Carrier, Security, and Compliance Contact Plan: scope, decisions, requirements, evidence, risks, and traceability for the Agent OS programme.

Edit on GitHub →

Certification, Carrier, Security, and Compliance Contact Plan

This document is an engineering issue map for qualified counsel and compliance specialists; it is not legal advice or a substitute for jurisdiction-specific review.

Table of Contents

Purpose and Scope

Area: Legal and Compliance.

This document is an engineering issue map for qualified counsel and compliance specialists; it is not legal advice or a substitute for jurisdiction-specific review.

This document owns the semantics implied by Certification, Carrier, Security, and Compliance Contact Plan. It does not assert that every described subsystem already exists. It defines the target model, constraints, evidence needed to trust an implementation, and the boundary with adjacent documents.

Normative Position

  1. Model assets, actors, trust boundaries, capabilities, update keys, hardware roots, user data classes, agents, and external providers.
  2. Default-deny authority, explicit data minimization, compartmentalized parsers, and measured recovery are system properties.
  3. Hardware-bound secrets are non-exportable; migration re-enrolls rather than copies them.

Operating Model

The operating model is contract-first and evidence-driven. A component declares its authority, resources, lifecycle, error model, cancellation and timeout behavior, observability, version, and compatibility promise. Backends are replaceable only when the same conformance suite passes and no forbidden platform type leaks into portable layers.

Implementation proceeds through a reference model or mock, deterministic QEMU evidence where relevant, documentation-first physical hardware, and quality-hardware evidence. Pixel 9 adapters remain quarantined according to ADR-0004.

Requirements

  • R01. Model assets, actors, trust boundaries, capabilities, update keys, hardware roots, user data classes, agents, and external providers.
  • R02. Default-deny authority, explicit data minimization, compartmentalized parsers, and measured recovery are system properties.
  • R03. Hardware-bound secrets are non-exportable; migration re-enrolls rather than copies them.
  • R04. Specify normal, partial, denied, timeout, cancellation, restart, upgrade, and permanent-failure behavior.
  • R05. Expose structured diagnostics without leaking secrets or vendor-specific implementation details.
  • R06. Link material unknowns to a claim and, when testable, an experiment with an owner and gate.
  • R07. Update affected documentation and task data when evidence changes the model.

Failure and Degradation

Degradation must be explicit rather than accidental. The system reports capability absence, reduced quality, unavailable provider, stale data, or unsafe condition through typed states. It must not silently fall back to broader authority, unrestricted legacy execution, unverified firmware, lossy data migration, or irreversible agent action.

Recovery defines what state is retained, reconstructed, re-enrolled, compensated, or intentionally discarded. Unsupported hardware or providers are rejected at binding time where possible.

Evidence and Acceptance

  • Threat-model review and abuse-case tests.
  • SBOM, provenance, signing and reproducible-build evidence.
  • Security, privacy and agent red-team suites.
  • Evidence records target identity, hardware revision, firmware, source commit, toolchain, configuration, seed, timestamps, artifacts, expected result, actual result, and reviewer.
  • Acceptance requires the referenced tasks to meet their own criteria; prose completion is not implementation completion.

Implementation Obligations

No current task row references this document directly. Before implementation begins, create an owned task or explicitly mark the document as informational.

Risks and Open Questions

  • Agents increase the blast radius of confused authority.
  • Supply-chain compromise can bypass runtime isolation.
  • Debug and trace facilities can leak data or weaken secure boot.
  • Open-question rule: an unanswered high-impact question becomes a claim/experiment record and cannot be hidden in meeting notes.
  • Stop rule: work stops or changes track when legal rights, recovery, debug access, safety, or the required evidence path is unavailable.

Related Documents

Planning Reference Anchors

No additional task-specific anchors are required in this baseline.